Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Athenian Political Thinking and the Empire of Alexander the Great

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ph.D. Irina FRASIN

    (Researcher in the Institute of Social and Economic Research “Gh. Zane”, Iasi, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Under Alexander the Great the Greeks conquered Asia. This extraordinary undertaking was made possible, beside the military achievement, by the Greek thought and philosophy. The belief in the superiority of the Greek over the barbarian and freedom of the first and slavery of the second rendered the conquest and domination of Asia into a noble “mission of civilization”. The V-th century BC was the glory age of Athens. The great polis presented itself as a model of democracy, a cultural center of the Greek world, which it dominated by its wealth and power. At the height of its glory Athens was the cradle of the most elegant and refined art, the most eloquent and deep philosophy and the most complex and moving tragedy; it was a city admired and feared, a symbol of the Greek world. Today, when we study the ancient democracy, we continue to be fascinated by the great achievements of the Athenians but we also see the down sides of their political system. In our time, when the civilizations confront and all the cultures claim their right to existence, the Greek notion of “barbarian” captures the attention of researchers. After the Persian Wars and successful confrontation with the Great King and his huge armies the Athenians gained a great sense of the virtues they posses. This is most obvious where all these virtues are united to form a political ideal. The democratic ideal, invented by the Greeks, supposed a type of society formed by the free and willingly acceptance of its members. All citizens were equal and they obeyed only the law. Thus Greece became the model for all that was civilized, rational and by contrast the barbarians embodied different stages of irrational thought. But we should not characterize the Greek – barbarian distinction as ethnocentrism. Most of the Greek texts refer not to innate features but to achieved ones. We become barbarians living among barbarians and we can learn the Greek way of life. In fact there was no difference of nature, it was only one of culture, and the Greek “superior” culture was opened to everyone. The idea was clearly stated by Isocrates when he said that “Athens has become the teacher of the other cities, and has made the name Greek no longer a mark of race but of intellect, so that it is those who share our upbringing rather than our common nature who are called Hellenes”. We have here a beautiful declaration of universalism. This marks the moment when the Greek laws become the laws of all mankind. And it is just this universalism (even if this way of thinking may worry us) that made possible the idea of a Greek empire that wanted to impose to all mankind one law and one culture.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://edituralumen.ro/conferintalumen2011/?p=267
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Editura Lumen, Department of Economics in its journal Conferinta Stiintifica Internationala Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Lumen International Scientific Conference Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2011)
    Issue (Month): (February)
    Pages: 80-81

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:lum:rev10b:v:1:y:2010:i::p:80-81

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://edituralumen.ro

    Related research

    Keywords: culture; democracy; philosophy; conflict; domination;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev10b:v:1:y:2010:i::p:80-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Morariu Irina).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.