IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/jsmijo/v2y2020i1p52-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sacred in Pop-culture -The Protest of the Secularization of the “Z” Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuel Cășvean

    (PhD Candidate of the Faculty of Theology, within the Doctoral School "Isidor Todoran" of Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj Napoca, with a PhD Thesis on "Logosity and philosophical reasoning in Nichifor Crainic's work, hypostasis of contemporary orthodox spirituality", under the guidance of his Eminence Andrei Andreicuț, Professor PhD, as well as graduate of the Faculty of History and Philosophy within Babeș-Bolyai University, department of Philosophy, Culture and Communication, Ancient and Medieval Philosophy)

Abstract

Post-modern society is in an ongoing process of globalization and digitalization. Human culture knows no geo-political boundaries and is becoming globalized in its turn, enabling us to already speak of a culture of a global community (society), that is deeply infused with beliefs, precepts, signs, symbols, meanings and significance, which would have earlier been defining for a particular society / particular culture (identifiable in a precise space of the oikouménē-i), but which is now popularizing, globalizing and, to a large extent, transcending real space - through digitalization - to a new ontological space: that of the virtual. In this context, we are witnessing a dissolution of the old socio-cultural paradigms, a trans-cultural and trans-generational mélange. The present paper seeks to bring to light the issue of the loss of the element of sacredness, once ubiquitous in the mundane, proper to postmodern culture as an inherent consequence of the hyper-technologicalization of the world and traditional secularization. Furthermore, the paper is intended as an analysis of the process of recharging the lost sacred symbol (of sacredness) of the virtual world, and not only, under the paradigm of universal pop culture. In order to account for what is proposed for argumentation, we will focus our argumentation on the way in which "Generation Z" breaks with the secularized tradition (unadapted to the post-modern era), revises its cultural foundations, and proposes (volens-nolens) a new form of resacralization of the extended ontological mundane (incorporating the virtual), as a generalized protest against traditional secularization. This form of the sacred preserves unaltered the continuous search for the sacred in the profane, as a constitutive element of human nature, but it lends it an increased adaptability to the conjunctures of post-modern society. The meta-sacredness, proposed even by Generation Z, is intended to be a substitute for the already secularized and rigid sacredness, offering an incorporation of the transcultural magic-mystical element, in a "popular" form (characteristic to pop culture) – full of signs, pre-existing symbols, meanings and significance, however, in a reinterpreted fashion, modified and purified of the localization element, in a process of acceptance of glocalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuel Cășvean, 2018. "The Sacred in Pop-culture -The Protest of the Secularization of the “Z” Generation," Journal for Social Media Inquiry, Editura Lumen, vol. 1(1), pages 52-62, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:jsmijo:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:52-62
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jsmi/article/view/3221
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/jsmi/2.1/5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sacred; profane; pop culture; real space vs. virtual space; globalization; glocalization; Generation Z; global culture; magic; mystic; symbol;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:jsmijo:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:52-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jsmi/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.