IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lrc/larrss/v5y2020i1p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting e-learning Technologies in Higher Educational Institutions:The role of Organizational Culture, Technology Acceptance and Attitude

Author

Listed:
  • Analin B. Empaynado-Porto

    (Associate Professor –Faculty of Pharmacy. Research Associate -Research Center for Social Sciences and EducationUniversity of Santo Tomas, Philippines 1015.)

Abstract

Twenty-first century learning environments entail integration of technology into the educational settings. This study focused on organizational culture, technology acceptance and attitudeas push and pull factors in the adoption of e-learning technologies in a university setting. The study is a descriptive-correlational research. The respondents of the study are faculty members from universities in the Philippines. The study utilized the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (Cameron and Quinn, 2005), Technology Acceptance Questionnaire (Davis, 1986) and Technology Infusion model.The results of the study reveal that hierarchical culture is the dominant culture that exists in higher educational institution. Teachers’ technology acceptance is strongly related in the adoption of e-learning. Linear regression revealed that four out of six dimensions of organizational culture influences adoption of technology and all constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), as well as attitude and behaviorpredicts actual adoption of e-learning technologies in an educational setting. Results suggests that empowerment and active involvement of faculty is a key factor in adopting technology in aneducational environment. Thus, teachers are both designers of learning environment and organizational culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Analin B. Empaynado-Porto, 2020. "Adopting e-learning Technologies in Higher Educational Institutions:The role of Organizational Culture, Technology Acceptance and Attitude," Review of Social Sciences, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:lrc:larrss:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:1-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/143/63
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lrc:larrss:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: H Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.socialsciencejournal.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.