IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lif/jrgelg/v8y2019p437-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ratings of The Investment Projects of Arbitrary Durations: New Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • P.N. Brusov

    (Department of Data Analysis, Decision Making, and Financial Technology, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia)

  • T.V. Filatova
  • N.P. Orekhova
  • V.L. Kulik
  • I. Weil

Abstract

In this paper we develop for the first time a new approach to ratings of the investment projects of arbitrary durations, which could be applied to investments of any area of economy and in particular to energy projects.The ratings of such energy projects, as "Turkish stream", "Nord stream-2", energy projects relating to clean, renewable and sustainable energy, as well as relating to pricing carbon emissions (McAleer et al., 2018a,b,c; 2019) could be done using developed here new rating methodologies. In our previous papers the new approach to the ratings of the long–term investment projects has been developed (Filatova et al., 2018). The important features of that consideration are as following: 1) The incorporation of rating parameters (financial "ratios"), used in project rating and playing a major role in it, into modern long–term investment models, 2) The adequate use of discounting of financial flows virtually not used in existing project rating methodologies. Here, for the first time, we incorporate the rating parameters (financial "ratios"), used in project rating, into modern investment models, describing the investment projects of arbitrary durations. This was much more difficult task then in case of the long–term investment projects, considered by us in previous papers. We work within investment models, created by authors. One of them describes the effectiveness of investment project from perspective of equity capital owners, while other model describes the effectiveness of investment project from perspective of equity capital and debt capital owners. New approach allows use the powerful instruments of modern theory of capital cost and capital structure (BFO theory) (Brusov et al., 2015, 2018) and modern investment models, created by the authors and well tested in the real economy to evaluate investment project performance, including energy projects. In our calculations we use Excel technique in two aspects: 1) we calculate WACC at different values of equity costs k0, different values of debt costs kd and different values of leverage level L=D/S, using the famous BFO formula; 2) we calculate the dependences of NPV on coverage ratios as well as leverage ratios at different values of equity costs k0, different values of debt costs kd and different values of leverage level L. JEL Classification: C53, L94, Q47.

Suggested Citation

  • P.N. Brusov & T.V. Filatova & N.P. Orekhova & V.L. Kulik & I. Weil, 2019. "Ratings of The Investment Projects of Arbitrary Durations: New Methodology," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 8, pages 437-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:8:y:2019:p:437-448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.lifescienceglobal.com/independent-journals/journal-of-reviews-on-global-economics/volume-8/85-abstract/jrge/3612-abstract-ratings-of-the-investment-projects-of-arbitrary-durations-new-methodology
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Arbitrary duration investment projects; rating; rating methodology; discounting of financial flows; Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova theory; coverage ratios; leverage ratios.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • Q47 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy Forecasting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:8:y:2019:p:437-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Faisal Ameer Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lifescienceglobal.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.