Absence of an Optimal Capital Structure in the Famous Tradeoff Theory!
AbstractWithin modern theory of capital structure and capital cost by Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova the analysis of wide known tradeoff theory has been made. It is shown that suggestion of risky debt financing (and growing credit rate near the bankruptcy) in opposite to waiting result does not lead to growing of weighted average cost of capital, WACC, which still decreases with leverage. This means the absence of minimum in the dependence of WACC on leverage as well as the absence of maximum in the dependence of company capitalization on leverage. Thus, it seems that the optimal capital structure is absent in famous tradeoff theory. The explanation to this fact has been done
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Lifescience Global in its journal Journal of Reviews on Global Economics.
Volume (Year): 2 (2013)
Issue (Month): ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.lifescienceglobal.com
Tradeoff theory; debt financing; company capital cost; optimal capital structure; leverage; Modigliani– Miller theory; Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova theory;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Faisal Ameer Khan).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.