IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/scajes/v2y2016i3p44-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Asset Management and Profitability on Stock Returns: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Stock Markets in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Shelly Midesia
  • Hasan Basri
  • M. Shabri Abd. Majid

Abstract

This study aims at empirically examining whether there are differences in stock returns between conventional and Islamic stock returns In Indonesia for the period 2010-2013. This study also attempts to explore the effect of asset management and profitability both stock returns in Indonesia. Annual pooled data gathered from the annual financial reports of 100 conventional and Islamic stock returns, which were published by the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2013 were used and analyzed by using the independent t-test and panel multivariate regression analysis. The result shows that there was no difference in stock returns between the conventional and Islamic stock markets. Additionally, the study documents that only profitability, which is measured by market ratio, was found to have an influence on the conventional stock markets. Meanwhile, as for Islamic stock market, only management of assets was found to have a significant effect on the stock return. These findings imply that investors who are investing in both Islamic and conventional markets would gain similar returns. However, in predicting and stabilizing the stock markets, both investors and policy makers should focus on the profitability for the conventional and management of assets for the Islamic stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelly Midesia & Hasan Basri & M. Shabri Abd. Majid, 2016. "The Effects of Asset Management and Profitability on Stock Returns: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Stock Markets in Indonesia," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 2(3), pages 44-54, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:44-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_65.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_65.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Supriyanto Supriyanto & Suripto Suripto & Arif Sugiono & Putri Irmala Sari, 2021. "Impact of Oil Prices and Stock Returns: Evidence of Oil and Gas Mining Companies in Indonesia during the COVID-19 Period," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 312-318.
    2. Nastiti Pambayun Kinasih Yekti & Atahau Apriani Dorkas Rambu & Supramono Supramono, 2019. "Working Capital Management Policy: Female Top Managers and Firm Profitability," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 107-127, September.
    3. Endri Endri & Muhamad Rinaldi & Dini Arifian & Bungaran Saing & Aminudin Aminudin, 2021. "Oil Price and Stock Return: Evidence of Mining Companies in Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 110-114.
    4. Marc Ditzhaus & Daniel Gaigall, 2022. "Testing marginal homogeneity in Hilbert spaces with applications to stock market returns," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 749-770, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asset management; profitability; stock return; Islamic Stock Market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:44-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.