IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v8y2016i1p73-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romanian Tourists Interest in Traveling Abroad. Case study: Australian NGOs

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Cecilia Stanciulescu
  • Aurora Costina Linca
  • Adrian Catalin Voinila

Abstract

The present paper analyzes and compares the involvement of Romanian NGOs versus Australian NGOs, assuming that, although these two countries are very different, Romanian Non-Governmental Organizations might benefit from the experience and involvement of Australian NGOs. This study depicts the journeys made by Romanians during 2008-2014, which reveal that most of them are traveling within the European Union and very, few to Australia. The main NGOs in Australia, which take measures of protecting natural resources that attract tourists and are actively involved in promoting them and continuous visitors’ education, are presented herein. Through interactive programs, NGOs can act as tourist entertainers, which brings them into contact with many tourists, either Romanian or foreign. This represents, as well, a means of earning money, which are to be later invested into environment protection projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Cecilia Stanciulescu & Aurora Costina Linca & Adrian Catalin Voinila, 2016. "Romanian Tourists Interest in Traveling Abroad. Case study: Australian NGOs," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 8(1), pages 73-76, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:73-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol8-nr1-2016/12.%20Aurora%20Costina%20Linca.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol8-nr1-2016/12.%20Aurora%20Costina%20Linca.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:73-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.