IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kea/keappr/ker-200106-17-1-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Korean Economists` Belief About Economic Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Jae Ho Cho

    (University of Ulsan)

Abstract

This study compares the degree of consensus and dissension concerning 29 economic propositions among academic and non-academic economists in Korea. This study is based upon an anonymous questionnaire survey of 167 academic economists and 63 non-academic economists. Some results of this survey such as an ambivalent position between Keynesian, Monetarist and Market Advocate and correlation of average opinion among economists are also compared with those of the Japanese and the U.S. samples, which were surveyed by Takase et al. (2000) with the same propositions. This is the first survey that covers academic and non-academic economists in Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae Ho Cho, 2001. "Korean Economists` Belief About Economic Issues," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 17, pages 67-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-200106-17-1-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://keapaper.kea.ne.kr/RePEc/kea/keappr/KER-200106-17-1-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Korean economists; economic belief; Keynesian; Monetarist; Market advocate;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-200106-17-1-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: KEA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/keaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.