IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v97y1998i3p323-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamics of Interest Group Evaluations of Congress

Author

Listed:
  • Poole, Keith T
  • Rosenthal, Howard

Abstract

The authors apply a dynamic spatial model to interest group ratings of the members of Congress over the period 1959-81. Spatial distances between an interest group and the members of Congress are assumed to be monotonic with the ratings. Their pooled cross-sectional time-series data set consists of 203,387 ratings by fifty-nine interest groups. The authors restrict the spatial coordinates of the interest groups and members of Congress to be polynomial functions of time. Two significant dimensions are recovered: the first dimension, which accounts for approximately 75 percent of the variance, represents liberal-conservative positions on economic issues; the second dimension, which accounts for approximately an additional 5 percent of the variance, represents liberal-conservative positions on social issues. Nearly all the interest groups and most members of Congress are ideologically consistent. They are either liberal on both dimensions or conservative on both. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Poole, Keith T & Rosenthal, Howard, 1998. "The Dynamics of Interest Group Evaluations of Congress," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 323-361, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:97:y:1998:i:3:p:323-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristin Kanthak, 2002. "Top-Down Divergence," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 14(3), pages 301-323, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:97:y:1998:i:3:p:323-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.