IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v17y2017i2d10.1007_s11115-015-0335-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Nuclear-Weapon States Parties to the Non-proliferation Treaty Understand Nuclear Disarmament

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Morales Pedraza

    (University Degrees on Mathematics and on Economics)

Abstract

Disarmament measures included in the Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) are, for most of the nuclear-weapon states, an objective to be reached in a very long-term. Based on this position, the current nuclear-weapon states parties to the NPT believe that they do not have to show, at this stage, the necessary political will to begin the nuclear disarmament process at the multilateral level and under international supervision, as requested so many times by the international community on the basis of article VI of the NPT. For this reason, all of them are in the process of modernising their nuclear weapons arsenals, ignoring their commitments and obligations as NPT states parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Morales Pedraza, 2017. "How Nuclear-Weapon States Parties to the Non-proliferation Treaty Understand Nuclear Disarmament," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 211-235, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:17:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11115-015-0335-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-015-0335-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-015-0335-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-015-0335-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Congressional Budget Office, 2012. "An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2013 Shipbuilding Plan," Reports 43468, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:17:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11115-015-0335-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.