IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v68y2006i2p143-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence Masek

Abstract

In a recent contribution to this journal, Patrick Tully criticizes my view that the doctrine of double effect does not prohibit a pharmaceutical company from selling a drug that has potentially fatal side-effects and that does not treat a life-threatening condition. Tully alleges my account is too permissive and makes the doctrine irrelevant to decisions about selling harmful products. In the following paper, I respond to Tully’s objections and show that he misinterprets my position and misstates some elements of the doctrine of double effect. I also show how the doctrine constrains some decisions about marketing drugs with potentially fatal side-effects. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence Masek, 2006. "Deadly Drugs and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Tully," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 143-151, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:68:y:2006:i:2:p:143-151
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9060-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-006-9060-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-006-9060-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Velasquez, Manuel & Neil Brady, F., 1997. "Natural Law and Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 83-107, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Neves & Domènec Melé, 2013. "Managing Ethically Cultural Diversity: Learning from Thomas Aquinas," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 769-780, September.
    2. Alma Acevedo, 2012. "Personalist Business Ethics and Humanistic Management: Insights from Jacques Maritain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 197-219, January.
    3. Nicholas Burton & Matthew Sinnicks, 2022. "Quaker Business Ethics as MacIntyrean Tradition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 507-518, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:68:y:2006:i:2:p:143-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.