IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v54y2019i2d10.1007_s10614-018-9842-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer Satisfaction Prediction in the Shipping Industry with Hybrid Meta-heuristic Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Stelios Bekiros

    (Athens University of Economics and Business
    IPAG Business School)

  • Nikolaos Loukeris

    (University of Macedonia)

  • Nikolaos Matsatsinis

    (Technical University of Crete)

  • Frank Bezzina

    (University of Malta)

Abstract

Optimization and prediction of customer satisfaction in the shipping industry impacts immensely upon strategic planning and consequently on the targeted market share of a corporation. In shipping industry, accurate measures of customer satisfaction are usually very cumbersome to elaborate. In this work we aim to reveal the most effective optimization methods, employing artificial intelligence approaches such as rough sets, neural networks, advanced classification methods as well as multi-criteria analysis under a comparative framework vis-à-vis their forecasting performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Stelios Bekiros & Nikolaos Loukeris & Nikolaos Matsatsinis & Frank Bezzina, 2019. "Customer Satisfaction Prediction in the Shipping Industry with Hybrid Meta-heuristic Approaches," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 647-667, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:54:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-018-9842-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-018-9842-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-018-9842-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-018-9842-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Slowinski & C. Zopounidis, 1995. "Application of the Rough Set Approach to Evaluation of Bankruptcy Risk," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(1), pages 27-41, March.
    2. Stelios Bekiros & Nikolaos Loukeris & Iordanis Eleftheriadis & Christos Avdoulas, 2019. "Tail-Related Risk Measurement and Forecasting in Equity Markets," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 783-816, February.
    3. N. Loukeris & I. Eleftheriadis & E. Livanis, 2016. "The Portfolio Heuristic Optimisation System (PHOS)," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 627-648, December.
    4. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2002. "Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 148-170, November.
    5. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 1997. "Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 48-57, May.
    6. Nikolaos Loukeris & Iordanis Eleftheriadis, 2015. "Further Higher Moments in Portfolio Selection and A Priori Detection of Bankruptcy, Under Multi‐layer Perceptron Neural Networks, Hybrid Neuro‐genetic MLPs, and the Voted Perceptron," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 341-361, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mak, Brenda & Munakata, Toshinori, 2002. "Rule extraction from expert heuristics: A comparative study of rough sets with neural networks and ID3," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 212-229, January.
    2. Evangelos Vasileiou, 2022. "Inaccurate Value at Risk Estimations: Bad Modeling or Inappropriate Data?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 1155-1171, March.
    3. Nijkamp, Peter & Poot, Jacques, 2015. "Cultural Diversity: A Matter of Measurement," IZA Discussion Papers 8782, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    5. Pablo de Llano Monelos & Manuel Rodríguez López & Carlos Piñeiro Sánchez, 2013. "Bankruptcy Prediction Models in Galician companies. Application of Parametric Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 117-136.
    6. Evangelia Karasmanaki & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Spyridon Galatsidas & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2023. "Satisfaction with Media Information about Renewable Energy Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Maurizio d’Amato, 2007. "Comparing Rough Set Theory with Multiple Regression Analysis as Automated Valuation Methodologies," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 42-65.
    8. Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Noel, Laurent & Galariotis, Emilios & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2021. "An ordinal regression approach for analyzing consumer preferences in the art market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 718-733.
    9. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    10. Alessandro Scuderi & Luisa Sturiale & Giuseppe Timpanaro & Agata Matarazzo & Silvia Zingale & Paolo Guarnaccia, 2022. "A Model to Support Sustainable Resource Management in the “Etna River Valleys” Biosphere Reserve: The Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Daniel E. O'Leary, 2009. "Downloads and citations in Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1‐2), pages 21-31, January.
    12. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    13. S. Balcaen & H. Ooghe, 2004. "Alternative methodologies in studies on business failure: do they produce better results than the classical statistical methods?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/249, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    14. Si-Hui Dong & Hui-Cheng Zhou & Hai-Jun Xu, 2004. "A Forecast Model of Hydrologic Single Element Medium and Long-Period Based on Rough Set Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(5), pages 483-495, October.
    15. Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2010. "Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 163-172, March.
    16. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2018. "A fast heuristic attribute reduction approach to ordered decision systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 440-452.
    17. McKee, Thomas E. & Lensberg, Terje, 2002. "Genetic programming and rough sets: A hybrid approach to bankruptcy classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 436-451, April.
    18. Salman Bahoo & Marco Cucculelli & Xhoana Goga & Jasmine Mondolo, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-46, February.
    19. Gülgönül Bozoğlu Batı & İsmail Hakkı Armutlulu, 2020. "Work and family conflict analysis of female entrepreneurs in Turkey and classification with rough set theory," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Capotorti, Andrea & Barbanera, Eva, 2012. "Credit scoring analysis using a fuzzy probabilistic rough set model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 981-994.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Neural networks; Preference models; Decision support systems; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Data mining; Rough sets; Shipping;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:54:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10614-018-9842-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.