IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v13y2023i2p187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students' Perceptions about Course Evaluation: A Discourse Analysis from the Perspective of the Appraisal System

Author

Listed:
  • Bandar Fahad Alhamdan

Abstract

This qualitative study is based on a pedagogical action regarding discursive strategies used by university students in evaluating a course in which they are enrolled. The objective is to identify linguistic items using instruments and categories based on theoretical frameworks from the systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective (Halliday, 1985; Halliday & Mathiessen, 2014)- more specifically, carrying out a discourse analysis through the appraisal system elaborated by Martin and Rose (2003) and Martin and White (2005). The corpus of this research comprises responses to three open-ended evaluation questions to 24 participants. The discourse analysis of students’ evaluations focuses on the perceptions of these learners regarding the course’s positive and negative aspects. The researcher observed how, through lexicogrammatical choices, students characterize their perceptions of the course using the categories of appreciation and judgment, which are components of the subsystem of attitude, in the appraisal system, considering the types- reaction, composition and valuation and the subcategory capacity. Results indicated that the discourses were marked mainly by the subcategories of reaction quality and valuation relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bandar Fahad Alhamdan, 2023. "Students' Perceptions about Course Evaluation: A Discourse Analysis from the Perspective of the Appraisal System," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(2), pages 187-187, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/23068/14508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/23068
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.