IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v12y2022i8p49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Formative Assessment Practices: Primary Evidence on Relationship with Self-efficacy and Self-esteem

Author

Listed:
  • Li Yan
  • Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh

Abstract

Robust literature was conducted to confirm the positive effect of formative assessment on learning outcomes. However, less is known about the reason why formative assessment techniques impact student achievement. Besides, there are insufficient studies about relationships between formative classroom assessment techniques and self-efficacy, self-esteem. This article reviews literature related to use of formative assessment in classrooms, self-esteem and self-efficacy with intention to explore the connections. Students responded to questionnaires which covers results, discussion and implications about future study. The quasi-experimental research was designed to define the relationship between students’ achievement and formative assessment in classroom instructional approach. It is found that reducing variation in students’ achievement could be attained by increasing variation in formative assessment in classroom instructional approach with the presence of promoting self-esteem and self-efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Yan & Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh, 2022. "Review of Formative Assessment Practices: Primary Evidence on Relationship with Self-efficacy and Self-esteem," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(8), pages 1-49, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/22353/13985
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/22353
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.