IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijfr11/v7y2016i5p19-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Hire a Big 4 Auditor 500 Miles Away?

Author

Listed:
  • Lily Brooks
  • Michael D. Yu

Abstract

This paper investigates why a firm would hire an auditor far away from its corporate headquarter. Using a sample from the Audit Analytics database, we show that 75% of the firms hire a Big 4 auditor less than 33 miles away from their headquarters, and the median distance is only 14 miles. For the majority of firms, the driving time from a client¡¯s headquarter to its auditor¡¯s office is less than 45 minutes, and the median driving time is only 21 minutes. However, our results also show that some firms are willing to go the extra mile and hire a remote auditor. About 10% of the sample hire a Big 4 auditor more than 150 miles away, and some firms even hire an auditor more than 500 miles away. We test a few possible explanations, including earnings management hypothesis, competitive audit fee hypothesis, diversified operating location hypothesis, etc. Our analysis shows that firms having the tendency to manage earnings are more likely to hire a remote auditor. Specifically, we find that firms that are more likely to report small positive earnings, more likely to have financial restatements, and more likely to report higher expected discretionary accruals, tend to hire remote auditors. We also find that firms with diversified geographic segments, not operating segments, are more likely to hire remote auditors. Finally, we show that competitive audit pricing affects firms¡¯ office choice, but only within certain distance. Beyond certain limit, there is no difference in audit fees offered by local and non-local auditors.

Suggested Citation

  • Lily Brooks & Michael D. Yu, 2016. "Why Hire a Big 4 Auditor 500 Miles Away?," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(5), pages 19-41, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:5:p:19-41
    DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v7n5p19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/10359/6301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/10359
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijfr.v7n5p19?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:5:p:19-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijfr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.