IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2018v9p45-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Central European Free Trade Agreement: did the initiative prove its commitments?

Author

Listed:
  • Rodica CRUDU

    (Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova)

  • Olesea SIRBU

    (Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova)

  • Augustin IGNATOV

    (Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova)

Abstract

CEFTA 2006 is an important cooperation platform providing the Western Balkan countries and the Republic of Moldova with the opportunity to share experience and build functional economic relations. It aims to improve the economic development of the states through assuring a favourable environment for trade and investments. Moreover, CEFTA is viewed as a preparatory instrument for the future European integration of the states. It has been 10 years since the formation of CEFTA. Over this period, numerous economists, politicians and researchers debated on whether the initiative proved its commitments and what the impact of CEFTA on regional economic development, and in particular, on regional trade and investments is. Therefore, to reach relevant conclusions about the researched subject, the present paper is focused on quantitative data analysis involving descriptive and econometric methods. The analysis reflects the CEFTA general economic, trade and investments performances by examining the respective indicators including GDP per capita, GDP growth rate, total trade, imports/exports and net foreign direct investments inflows. Also, several inferences based on the correlation analysis of individual countries and the average CEFTA indicators in terms of per capita GDP, exports/ imports, net FDI inflows are provided. The results obtained show that the CEFTA’s primordial achievement is the de-tensioning and improvement of the political-economic evolution in the Western Balkans, followed by some trade benefits and a modest rise in the countries’ FDI performance. We have reached the conclusion that the agreement is primarily beneficial to the countries’ economic relations with their neighbours and the EU, having a favourable, yet, not determinative impact on economic development, trade and investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodica CRUDU & Olesea SIRBU & Augustin IGNATOV, 2018. "Central European Free Trade Agreement: did the initiative prove its commitments?," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9, pages 45-62, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2018:v:9:p:45-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2018_0901_CRU.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    2. Joze Damijan & José de Sousa & Olivier Lamotte, 2010. "Trade Liberalization in Southeastern Europe," Chapters, in: Robert E.B. Lucas & Lyn Squire & T. N. Srinivasan (ed.), Global Exchange and Poverty, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thumira Gunasena, 2016. "The applicability of adopting European Union?s integration model in South Asia: A comparative analysis of European Union and South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 19-43, May.
    2. Ockert Dupper, 2015. "Building the ASEAN Center for Humanitarian Assistance and Emergency Response. Is ASEAN Learning from the Experience of the European Civil Protection Mechanism?," KFG Working Papers p0062, Free University Berlin.
    3. Libman, Alexander & Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2016. "Региональные Организации: Типы И Логика Развития [Regional Organizations: Typology and Development Paths]," MPRA Paper 79383, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    5. Eva Scherwitz, 2016. "The EU’s approach towards Asia: regional cooperation and regional conflicts in the past and today," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 367-382, December.
    6. Anja Jetschke, 2010. "Do Regional Organizations Travel? - European Integration, Diffusion and the Case of ASEAN," KFG Working Papers p0017, Free University Berlin.
    7. Steffen Murau & Kilian Spandler, 2016. "EU, US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy‐Making: Bridging the EU Studies–New Regionalism Divide," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 928-943, July.
    8. Yeikyoung Kim, 2016. "The European Union, regional integration, and conflict transformation in the South China Sea territorial disputes," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 383-399, December.
    9. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    10. Vincent Rollet, 2017. "Influence of EU-ASEAN health interregionalism on regional health governance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 243-259, September.
    11. Wooyeal Paik, 2016. "Domestic politics, regional integration, and human rights: interactions among Myanmar, ASEAN, and EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 417-434, December.
    12. A. M. Libman, 2019. "Learning from the European Union? Eurasian Regionalism and the "Global Script"," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 12(2).
    13. Jens-Uwe Wunderlich, 2012. "Comparing regional organisations in global multilateral institutions: ASEAN, the EU and the UN," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 127-143, July.
    14. Arie Krampf, 2013. "The Life Cycles of Competing Policy Norms - Localizing European and Developmental Central Banking Ideas," KFG Working Papers p0049, Free University Berlin.
    15. Libman, Alexander, 2015. "Ukrainian Crisis, Economic Crisis in Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union," MPRA Paper 63861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Frederick Kliem, 2021. "ASEAN and the EU amidst COVID-19: overcoming the self-fulfilling prophecy of realism," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 371-389, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2018:v:9:p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.