IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.54year2020issue2pp75-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Mexican Manufacturing Workers Underpaid? Some Quarterly Time Series Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente German-Soto
  • Gregory Brock

    (Autonomous University of Coahuila, Mexico
    Georgia Southern University, U.S.A)

Abstract

The quarterly empirical relationship between Mexican manufacturing labor productivity and salaries 1993-2015 is examined for causality and whether first order labor market equilibrium is evident. An equilibrium would mean salaries and labor productivity are cointegrated. Wages above productivity levels may lead to calls for government intervention in the labor market. Federal quarterly data cover the nine main divisions of the manufacturing sector (old classification) as well as manufacturing overall. We use two series: labor productivity and average salaries with adjustment for inflation using the US consumer price index (2010 = 100). The time series is from 1993.1 to 2015.3. Standard cointegration analysis with structural change is applied with structural breaks hypothesized in 2008 with the Great Recession and 1995 with the Peso crisis. Tests for stationarity are applied to potentially correct for problems using first differences. Results indicate a statistically significant and negative relationship between labor productivity and salaries early in the sample period that becomes positive after structural changes. Salaries are more sensitive to events and volatile while productivity exhibits stable growth during 1993-2015. Salaries were impacted by both the 1995 Peso crisis and the Great Recession (2008) but productivity was only impacted by the latter. Higher labor productivity has not been rewarded with higher salaries suggesting Mexican manufacturing workers are underpaid. The firms where they work therefore have excess profits that can be used for investment and/or pay raises. Only the Timber and Metals divisions are found to not have salaries and productivity cointegrated. Government intervention in the form of wage setting or wage protection to protect firms from higher labor costs is unnecessary as firms are underpaying their workers. The government should reduce its role in the manufacturing labor markets. Foreign firms can hire underpaid workers away from domestic industry and take advantage of the labor market disequilibrium. Unions can insist on higher salaries to match their highly productive members work.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente German-Soto & Gregory Brock, 2020. "Are Mexican Manufacturing Workers Underpaid? Some Quarterly Time Series Evidence," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 54(2), pages 75-93, April-Jul.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.54:year:2020:issue2:pp75-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/723897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nurliyana Mohd Basri & Zulkefly Abdul Karim & Noorasiah Sulaiman, 2020. "The Effects of Factors of Production Shocks on Labor Productivity: New Evidence Using Panel VAR Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor Productivity; Salaries; Cointegration; Structural Change; Manufacturing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.54:year:2020:issue2:pp75-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.