IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.53year2019issue3pp59-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Environmental Reporting Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Sin Huei Ng
  • Boon Heng Teh
  • Shi Harn Ooi
  • Tze San Ong
  • Wei Ni Soh

    (Xiamen University Malaysia, Malaysia
    Multimedia University, Malaysia
    Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
    Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

International media attention and increased public concerns have created global environmental issues, thus, companies now face great pressure to engage in environmental activities while environmental reporting (ER) acts as a medium for disclosure of their environmental responsibility in fulfilling the social needs. Therefore, embarking on effective environmental engagement will sustain better life. Thus, this study purposes to evaluate the impacts of ER practices on financial performance using the outcome indicators of return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA) and earnings per share (EPS). Furthermore, this study also makes comparison between companies in ESI and non-ESI. This study has employed the stratified random sampling technique in order to determine the sample size from the population of ESI and non-ESI companies. Content analysis was adopted to examine the annual reports of 78 Malaysian PLCs from years 2010 until 2014 through the usage of measurement of volume in terms of sentences and the disclosure index to determine the quantity of ER and quality of ER respectively. The analysis shows that there is no significant relationship between ER practices and ROE and ROA, whereas there is a significant positive relationship between the existence of ER and EPS. For ESI companies, there is significant positive relationship between existence of ER and financial performance while a significant negative relationship is found between quality of ER and financial performance. On the other hand, there is no evidence of significant relationship to be found between ER practices and financial performance of non-ESI companies. Furthermore, it can be clearly seen that the existence of ER is higher in ESI companies as compared to non-ESI companies. This research has shown that the number of disclosing companies is promising, however the quantity and quality of ER is still unfavorable where the PLCs are still lacking in providing environmental information needed by the public. Nevertheless, since ER is still a voluntary move in Malaysia, regulators are advised to take initiatives to enhancing this practice through communicating the benefits to the companies and at the same time ensure the mandatory adoption of the ER practices in terms of the quantity and quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Sin Huei Ng & Boon Heng Teh & Shi Harn Ooi & Tze San Ong & Wei Ni Soh, 2019. "Does Environmental Reporting Matter?," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 53(3), pages 59-75, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue3:pp:59-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/715369/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahil Singh Jasrotia & Manoj Kumar Kamila & Vinod Kumar Patel, 2023. "Impact of Sustainable Tourism on Tourist’s Satisfaction: Evidence from India," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(2), pages 173-189, May.
    2. Jurjonas, Matthew & Merino Pérez, Leticia & Robson, James & Tadeo Noble, Alfredo Esteban, 2023. "Intergenerational perceptions of the collective action challenges facing Mexican community forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Reporting Practices; Financial Performance; Public Listed Companies; Environmentally Sensitive Industries; Non-Environmentally Sensitive Industries; Malaysia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue3:pp:59-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.