IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.52year2018issue2pp127-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exchange Rate And Central Bank Intervention In India: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pami Dua
  • Ritu Suri

    (University of Delhi, India)

Abstract

The existing empirical studies on the effectiveness of RBI intervention in the exchange rate market are based on single equation/GARCH models. Recognizing the interdependence between exchange rate returns, conditional volatility of exchange rate and RBI intervention, this study uses a simultaneous equations framework to examine the efficacy of intervention by RBI. Additionally, we control for the impact of macro-economic fundamental variables and micro-structure variable in our model. The econometric methodology used in the study includes two steps. In the first step, DF-GLS, Ng-Perron and, Lee and Strazicich unit root tests are used to examine the stationarity of the variables. In the second step, the simultaneous equations model is estimated using the generalized method of moments (GMM)-IV. This study is based on secondary data at monthly frequency, spreading from 1996:08 to 2016:10. The main findings of the study are as follows. The results of unit root tests suggest that all variables included in the analysis are stationary. The system GMM-IV estimates of the model indicate that exchange rate returns are influenced by RBI intervention, output growth differential, money supply growth differential, stock market returns, capital flows, EUR-USD exchange rate returns, change in trade balance differential and order flow. Additionally, the estimates of exchange rate volatility equation suggest that RBI intervention significantly decreases exchange rate volatility. Further, we find that volatility in capital flows has significant and positive impact on exchange rate volatility. The estimates of the central bank intervention equation suggests that exchange rate returns have a significant and negative impact on RBI intervention in foreign exchange rate market. We also find evidence for the presence of asymmetry in RBI intervention. The key implications of the study indicate that RBI intervention is effective in stabilizing the Indian exchange rate market in the face of both domestic and external shocks. Furthermore, exchange rate returns are significantly affected by RBI intervention, macro-economic variables and micro-structure variable. The findings of this study may be useful for formulating India's monetary policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Pami Dua & Ritu Suri, 2018. "Exchange Rate And Central Bank Intervention In India: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 52(2), pages 127-143, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue2:pp:127-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/677052
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pami Dua & Ritu Suri, 2019. "Interlinkages Between USD–INR, EUR–INR, GBP–INR and JPY–INR Exchange Rate Markets and the Impact of RBI Intervention," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 18(1_suppl), pages 102-136, April.
    2. O. P. C. Muhammed Rafi & M. Ramachandran, 2018. "Capital flows and exchange rate volatility: experience of emerging economies," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 183-205, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Exchange rate; ARMA-GARCH; GMM-IV; RBI intervention;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue2:pp:127-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.