IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue4pp181-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application Of A New Seasonal Unit Root Test For Trending And Breaking Series To Industrial Production Of The Brics

Author

Listed:
  • Ghassen El Montasser
  • Rangan Gupta

    (University of Manouba, Tunisia
    University of Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

Seasonality is a quite dominant source of variation in many economic time series. Several empirical studies have shown that seasonality is not a stable component but rather of stochastic nature. In this spirit, literature has seen the development of several seasonal unit root tests by generalizing the frameworks of the conventional (non-seasonal) ones. In general, existing tests for seasonal unit roots are heavily dependent on some restricted specifications for the deterministic component or they are interested in a particular observation frequency. The seasonal unit root test of Hylleberg et al. (1990) [HEGY] is the most in empirical works. The strong point of this procedure is that it can distinguish between different seasonal unit roots. However, such a procedure does not take into account the breakpoints characterizing some macroeconomic data. In this study, we investigate the persistence property of the quarterly industrial production of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, covering the period of early 1990s till the last quarter of 2013, with the industrial production for BRICS characterized by strong seasonality and upward trend. For our purpose, we use the seasonal unit root test developed by Popp (2007), which controls for not only seasonal and trending behavior, but also for a break of unknown timing in seasonal means. Specifically, Popp’s (2007) test is based on an HEGY testing strategy with innovational outliers. It has been shown that this test has a stable size even in the presence of large breaks. Also, it can accurately identify the dates of small breaks. Our results indicate that, while there exist a non-seasonal unit root in the industrial production for Brazil, India and China, there is a strong evidence a seasonal unit root at Nyquist frequency for only China. In addition, there is a strong evidence of rejection of bi-annual unit roots in all BRICS industrial production. Using Jaccard (1902) coefficients for similarities, the greatest ones are recorded for Brazil and South Africa on the one hand, and Russia and South Africa on the other hand. By contrast, Russia and India have no similarity. Accordingly, some policy implications can be formulated for China as it is the only country, among the BRICS, which exhibits a seasonal unit root in its industrial production. Our results therefore, suggest that economists should examine the evolution of industrial production in China not only at the business cycle frequencies but also at the seasonal as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghassen El Montasser & Rangan Gupta, 2016. "An Application Of A New Seasonal Unit Root Test For Trending And Breaking Series To Industrial Production Of The Brics," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(4), pages 183-194, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue4:pp:181-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/639394
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Seasonal unit root tests; Structural breaks; Linear time trend; Industrial production; BRICS.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue4:pp:181-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.