IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue3pp35-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do capital requirements affect cost of intermediation?: Evidence from a panel of South African banks

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Maredza

    (North-West University, South Africa)

Abstract

In the wake of the 2007 sub-prime financial crisis, global measures under the Basel Accord framework were taken to guarantee the preservation of adequate capital for the stability of the banking industry and to prevent another banking crisis. As a result, world bank capital ratios have increased. The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the impact of increased bank capital requirements in general and in particular those introduced under Basel II on the cost of intermediation in South Africa. Empirical evidence on the nexus between capital requirements and intermediation costs has significant implications on the lending market and therefore on the growth prospects of a country. Furthermore, higher intermediation costs undermines efforts towards financial inclusion particularly in South Africa where broader access to bank services for all remains a critical factor for redressing the challenges of high income inequalities. Utilizing annual bank-level data obtained from Bankscope for the period 2001 – 2012, the fixed effects estimation technique is applied on a balanced panel of ten banks constituting inter alia the four largest South African banks. For robustness, two alternative cost of intermediation variables are chosen, NIM1 which is net interest revenue to interest earning assets ratio while NIM2 is net interest revenue to average total assets ratio. Two proxy measures of capital requirements are employed namely the equity-to-total-assets ratio and a Basel II dummy variable to take the value one in 2008 and subsequent periods and zero otherwise. In addition to these variables, a number of bank-specific and macroeconomic variables that are hypothesized to influence the basic functions of banks are incorporated into the model. The results from estimating the fixed effects model show that a one percent increase in capital requirements lead on average to a range of 12 – 14 basis points increase in the cost of intermediation during the period of analysis. Empirical evidence from the study also indicate that the Basel II capital requirements effected in January 2008 contributed to increased cost of intermediation by an average 7 basis points for the period 2008 – 2012. We conclude that high capital requirements are associated with increased costs of intermediation. We therefore caution that while maintaining adequate capital levels is crucial for obvious reasons, there is need for supervisory authorities to ensure that such regulation is effective and well-balanced to guarantee safety and stability of the sector without endangering the ability of the banks to service the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Maredza, 2016. "Do capital requirements affect cost of intermediation?: Evidence from a panel of South African banks," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(3), pages 35-51, July-Sept.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue3:pp:35-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/624654
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neryvia Pillay & Konstantin Makrelov, 2024. "The lending implications of banks holding excess capital," Working Papers 11056, South African Reserve Bank.
    2. Shaun de Jager & Riaan Ehlers & Keabetswe Mojapelo & Pieter Pienaar, 2021. "Shortterm impacts and interaction of macroprudential policy tools," Working Papers 11020, South African Reserve Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Basel accord; Bank Capital adequacy ratio; Financial regulation; Intermediation costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue3:pp:35-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.