IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.49year2015issue6pp333-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volatility and co-movement: an analysis of stock markets behavior of selected emerging and developed countries

Author

Listed:
  • Sarod Khandaker
  • Silvia Zia Islam

    (Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
    RMIT University, Australia)

Abstract

Financial markets around the world suffer significantly during the GFC and European debt crisis. Although the GFC is over, but the after-effect is still visible in most of the developed and emerging countries and stock markets remained volatile. In this paper, we analyse historical stock market volatility and co-movement behavior of three emerging markets and three developed economies from January 2001 to December 2012. We investigate whether the stock market volatilities and co-movement behaviors are correlated and affected by the GFC during the observation period. Our analysis of stock market behavior and co-movement analysis includes the standard historical volatility model and R-square estimates. We use the standard historical volatility model followed by Jones et al. (1998), Andersen and Bollerslev (1997) and Andersen and Bollerslev (1998); and the R-square metrics were suggested by Morck et al. (2000), Khandaker and Heaney (2009) and Alves et al. (2010). The selection criteria for the developed economies include geographical location, availability of stock return data and size of the equity market; and emerging markets are taken from the emerging Asian markets based on their recent market performance, growth rate and market capitalisation. We find evidence that the sample of emerging markets, exhibits higher stock market volatility during the sample period and these volatilities increases during the GFC. There is also evidence that the sample emerging countries exhibit a higher level of stock market co-movement behavior, and these markets were highly synchronous during the GFC. For example, China exhibits higher stock return co-movement behavior and, this behavior increase during the GFC. Further, we do not find any evidence of a statistically significant correlation coefficient between the volatility measures and stock return co-movement measures for our sample developed countries. However, these measures are statistically significant for the emerging country group. The example includes China and Malaysia. Our result provides evidence that stock market co-movement behavior or the R-squared matrix captures somewhat different aspects of stock market behavior other than the stock market volatility for the developed economies. Therefore, it is concluded that both these market models capture somewhat different aspects of stock market behavior and should be carefully used.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarod Khandaker & Silvia Zia Islam, 2015. "Volatility and co-movement: an analysis of stock markets behavior of selected emerging and developed countries," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(6), pages 333-347, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue6:pp:333-347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v049/49.6.khandaker.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Condorelli, Stefano, 2014. "The 1719-20 stock euphoria: a pan-European perspective," MPRA Paper 68652, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2015.
    2. Muhammad Ali Nasir & Muhammad Shahbaz & Trinh Thi Mai & Moade Shubita, 2021. "Development of Vietnamese stock market: Influence of domestic macroeconomic environment and regional markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1435-1458, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Historical volatility; Co-movement; GFC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue6:pp:333-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.