IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isp/journl/v11y2017i1p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Issues On Measuring Employee Wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Ilona Cserháti
  • Tibor Keresztély

Abstract

Quality of life at the workplace has a substantial impact on wellbeing of most adults. We distinguished three types of determinants: work-specific drivers, objective features of the employee as part of human capital (age, employment status, education level, etc.) and other subjective perceptions, feelings and attitudes (personality type, general life satisfaction) of the employee. Majority of people spend significant part of their life at work so it is crucial to determine those drivers which make employees happier, more satisfied – and hopefully – more productive. The first task was to find the key work-specific and personal features that affect employee wellbeing. The second issue was to test the assumption that job-satisfaction is positively correlated with the productivity on individual level. We tested our hypothesis on EU-SILC micro dataset together with its special module on wellbeing for 2013. We found that job satisfaction had a direct positive influence on individual productivity. We made some conclusions and emphasized the role of the employers and the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilona Cserháti & Tibor Keresztély, 2017. "Methodological Issues On Measuring Employee Wellbeing," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 11(1), pages 41-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:41-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-publications.net/get/1000025/1503417510328607.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    subjective wellbeing; job satisfaction; workplace performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svetoslav Ivanov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scientific-publications.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.