IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v53y2019i6p1591-1608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice Network Revenue Management Based on New Tractable Approximations

Author

Listed:
  • Sumit Kunnumkal

    (Indian School of Business, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500032, India)

  • Kalyan Talluri

    (Imperial College Business School, South Kensington Campus, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom)

Abstract

The choice network revenue management model incorporates customer purchase behavior as probability of purchase as a function of the offered products and is appropriate for airline and hotel network revenue management, dynamic sales of bundles, and dynamic assortment optimization. The optimization problem is a stochastic dynamic program and is intractable. Consequently, a linear programming approximation called choice deterministic linear program ( CDLP ) is usually used to generate controls. Tighter approximations, such as affine and piecewise-linear relaxations, have been proposed, but it was not known if they can be solved efficiently even for simple models, such as the multinomial logit (MNL) model with a single segment. We first show that the affine relaxation (and, hence, the piecewise-linear relaxation) is NP-hard even for a single-segment MNL choice model. By analyzing the affine relaxation, we derive a new linear programming approximation that admits a compact representation, implying tractability, and prove that its value falls between the CDLP value and the affine relaxation value. This is the first tractable relaxation for the choice network revenue management problem that is provably tighter than CDLP . This approximation, in turn, leads to new policies that, in our numerical experiments, show very good promise: a 2% increase in revenue on average over CDLP and the values typically coming very close to the affine relaxation. We extend our analysis to obtain other tractable approximations that yield even tighter bounds. We also give extensions to the case with multiple customer segments with overlapping consideration sets in which choice by each segment is according to the MNL model.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2019. "Choice Network Revenue Management Based on New Tractable Approximations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1591-1608, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:53:y:2019:i:6:p:1591-1608
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2018.0867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2018.0867
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2018.0867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paat Rusmevichientong & David Shmoys & Chaoxu Tong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2014. "Assortment Optimization under the Multinomial Logit Model with Random Choice Parameters," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(11), pages 2023-2039, November.
    2. Kalyan Talluri, 2014. "New Formulations for Choice Network Revenue Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 401-413, May.
    3. Meissner, Joern & Strauss, Arne, 2012. "Network revenue management with inventory-sensitive bid prices and customer choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 459-468.
    4. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2016. "Technical Note—A Note on Relaxations of the Choice Network Revenue Management Dynamic Program," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 158-166, February.
    5. Peeters, M.J.P., 2003. "The maximum edge biclique problem is NP-complete," Other publications TiSEM 3e340431-37b3-4bc5-9b14-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Arne K. Strauss & Kalyan Talluri, 2017. "Tractable Consideration Set Structures for Assortment Optimization and Network Revenue Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(7), pages 1359-1368, July.
    7. Negin Golrezaei & Hamid Nazerzadeh & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2014. "Real-Time Optimization of Personalized Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1532-1551, June.
    8. Juan José Miranda Bront & Isabel Méndez-Díaz & Gustavo Vulcano, 2009. "A Column Generation Algorithm for Choice-Based Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 769-784, June.
    9. Qian Liu & Garrett van Ryzin, 2008. "On the Choice-Based Linear Programming Model for Network Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 288-310, October.
    10. Dan Zhang & Daniel Adelman, 2009. "An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Network Revenue Management with Customer Choice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 381-394, August.
    11. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Dan Zhang, 2015. "Reductions of Approximate Linear Programs for Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1352-1371, December.
    12. Juan M. Chaneton & Gustavo Vulcano, 2011. "Computing Bid Prices for Revenue Management Under Customer Choice Behavior," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 452-470, October.
    13. Hosseinalifam, M. & Marcotte, P. & Savard, G., 2016. "A new bid price approach to dynamic resource allocation in network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 142-150.
    14. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    15. Guillermo Gallego & Richard Ratliff & Sergey Shebalov, 2015. "A General Attraction Model and Sales-Based Linear Program for Network Revenue Management Under Customer Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 212-232, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bin Zhang & Li Sun & Mengyao Yang & Kin-Keung Lai & Bhagwat Ram, 2023. "A Robust Optimization Approach for Smart Energy Market Revenue Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Wuyang Yuan & Lei Nie, 2020. "Optimization of seat allocation with fixed prices: An application of railway revenue management in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Sebastian Vock & Laurie A. Garrow & Catherine Cleophas, 2022. "Clustering as an approach for creating data-driven perspectives on air travel itineraries," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 212-227, April.
    4. Xiang Zhao & Xinghua Shan & Jinfei Wu, 2023. "The Impact of Seat Resource Fragmentation on Railway Network Revenue Management," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 135-177, March.
    5. Laumer, Simon & Barz, Christiane, 2023. "Reductions of non-separable approximate linear programs for network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 252-270.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strauss, Arne K. & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2018. "A review of choice-based revenue management: Theory and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 375-387.
    2. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2019. "A strong Lagrangian relaxation for general discrete-choice network revenue management," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 275-310, May.
    3. Barbier, Thibault & Anjos, Miguel F. & Cirinei, Fabien & Savard, Gilles, 2020. "Product-closing approximation for ranking-based choice network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1002-1017.
    4. Yuhang Ma & Paat Rusmevichientong & Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "An Approximation Algorithm for Network Revenue Management Under Nonstationary Arrivals," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 834-855, May.
    5. Paat Rusmevichientong & Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "Dynamic Assortment Optimization for Reusable Products with Random Usage Durations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2820-2844, July.
    6. Guang Li & Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2015. "The d -Level Nested Logit Model: Assortment and Price Optimization Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 325-342, April.
    7. Meng Qi & Ho‐Yin Mak & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Data‐driven research in retail operations—A review," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 595-616, December.
    8. Laumer, Simon & Barz, Christiane, 2023. "Reductions of non-separable approximate linear programs for network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 252-270.
    9. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2016. "Technical Note—A Note on Relaxations of the Choice Network Revenue Management Dynamic Program," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 158-166, February.
    10. Wuyang Yuan & Lei Nie & Xin Wu & Huiling Fu, 2018. "A dynamic bid price approach for the seat inventory control problem in railway networks with consideration of passenger transfer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Sebastian Koch & Jochen Gönsch & Michael Hassler & Robert Klein, 2016. "Practical decision rules for risk-averse revenue management using simulation-based optimization," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(6), pages 468-487, December.
    12. Jacob B. Feldman & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2017. "Revenue Management Under the Markov Chain Choice Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1322-1342, October.
    13. C. I. Chiang, 2023. "Availability control under online reviews in hospitality," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 385-398, October.
    14. Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2012. "Robust Assortment Optimization in Revenue Management Under the Multinomial Logit Choice Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 865-882, August.
    15. Guillermo Gallego & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2014. "Constrained Assortment Optimization for the Nested Logit Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2583-2601, October.
    16. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2012. "A New Compact Linear Programming Formulation for Choice Network Revenue Management," Working Papers 677, Barcelona School of Economics.
    17. Sumit Kunnumkal & Kalyan Talluri, 2012. "A new compact linear programming formulation for choice network revenue management," Economics Working Papers 1349, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    18. Neda Etebari Alamdari & Gilles Savard, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning in seat inventory control problem: an action generation approach," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 566-579, October.
    19. Kameng Nip & Zhenbo Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Assortment Optimization under a Single Transition Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2122-2142, July.
    20. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Danny Segev & Chun Ye, 2020. "Constrained Assortment Optimization Under the Markov Chain–based Choice Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 698-721, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:53:y:2019:i:6:p:1591-1608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.