IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v22y1988i1p47-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traffic Flow for the Morning Commute

Author

Listed:
  • G. F. Newell

    (University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

Abstract

We imagine that drivers in the morning commute must traverse some homogeneous section of highway of length l > 0 and finite capacity q m to reach their workplaces. Each driver has a specified latest time at which he can exit the road and still be at work on time, but, because of the capacity and other traffic flow restrictions, it may be necessary that some drivers be at work earlier than their scheduled times if no one is to be late. Traffic is treated as a continuous fluid in the manner proposed by Lighthill and Whitham. This represents a generalization to l > 0 of a theory described by Hendrickson and Kocur for point bottlenecks ( l = 0) and a revision of a theory presented by Mahmassani and Herman. That waves can travel with only finite speed causes the schedule delay to be larger for l > 0 than for l = 0 and possibly be positive even if the demand rate is always less than q m . The conclusions, however, are quite different from those given by Mahmassani and Herman. If there is a cost per unit of trip time and another (lower) cost per unit of schedule delay, there is a well-defined system optimal assignment. There is some question, however, regarding the stability of the user optimal assignment.

Suggested Citation

  • G. F. Newell, 1988. "Traffic Flow for the Morning Commute," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 47-58, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:22:y:1988:i:1:p:47-58
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.22.1.47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.22.1.47
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.22.1.47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:22:y:1988:i:1:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.