IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v7y1996i1p88-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research

Author

Listed:
  • Anne S. Miner

    (School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 975 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53716-1323)

  • Stephen J. Mezias

    (Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 West 4th Street, New York, New York 10012-1126)

Abstract

This article addresses theoretical and research frontiers for learning research, a second theme of Professor Argyris essay---the lead article in the “Crossroads” section. We outline three key theoretical questions for further work. We call for more systematic empirical learning research, suggesting that the paucity of such research may have resulted less from defensiveness than from the demanding requirements of doing crisp, systematic learning research. The need for scholarly empirical work is enhanced, we believe, by the growing popularity of organizational learning models among practitioners. Concurring with Professor Argyris' broad concern with enhancing research fruitfulness, we suggest ways to supplement traditional organizational research methods. In particular, we argue that it makes sense to cast wider nets for models of learning and adaptation, to sustain qualitative investigation, to use simulation techniques, and to maintain stronger---and perhaps even experimental---linkages between applied and theoretical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne S. Miner & Stephen J. Mezias, 1996. "Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 88-99, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:7:y:1996:i:1:p:88-99
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.1.88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.1.88
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.7.1.88?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:7:y:1996:i:1:p:88-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.