IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v4y1993i3p433-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fragmented State and Due Process Protections in Organizations: The Case of Comparable Worth

Author

Listed:
  • Rikki Abzug

    (Program on Non-Profit Organizations, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520)

  • Stephen J. Mezias

    (Stern School, New York University, Department of Management and Organizational Behavior, 44 West 4th St., Room 7-55, New York, New York 10012)

Abstract

This analysis starts with models of the diffusion of due process protections in organizations that emphasize the role of the state, especially those from the institutional perspective. The case of equal pay for work of comparable value is used to develop propositions concerning important additions to current models of the expansion of due process protections in the workplace. First, we suggest that models of the nation-state should include an explicit recognition that the progressiveness of public policy varies over time. Second, we suggest that models of the nation-state should include explicit recognition of the fact that state authority is fragmented by the separation of powers and the partition of federal and local authority. Implications for future theory and empirical study that follow from these additions to current models are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rikki Abzug & Stephen J. Mezias, 1993. "The Fragmented State and Due Process Protections in Organizations: The Case of Comparable Worth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 433-453, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:433-453
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.4.3.433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.433
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.4.3.433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lounsbury, Michael, 2008. "Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 349-361.
    2. Lin, Xiaohua & Wang, Cheng Lu, 2008. "Enforcement and performance: The role of ownership, legalism and trust in international joint ventures," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 340-351, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:433-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.