IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v3y1992i1p117-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processing Unstructured Organizational Transactions: Mail Handling in the U.S. Senate

Author

Listed:
  • Mary J. Culnan

    (School of Business Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057)

Abstract

The conventional view of transaction processing, which has focused primarily on highly structured transactions, oversimplifies the information processing environment confronting most organizations. This exploratory field study investigates how U.S. Senate offices answer constituent mail on legislative issues. The study develops a model which views transaction processing systems (TPS) as an organizational information system. Using this model, the paper next develops the position that when TPS are viewed this way, the design and functioning of all TPS may be analyzed using the answers to three questions: (1) what transactions will be accepted by the organization for processing, (2) what rules will be used for processing transactions, and (3) how will feedback about these transactions be routed upward? Unlike most structured transactions, mail transactions are designed by the correspondent rather than the organization. As a result, the task of answering mail is characterized by low analyzability and high variety not found in most other routine transaction processing applications. Implications for the design of systems to support the processing of unstructured transactions in other contexts are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary J. Culnan, 1992. "Processing Unstructured Organizational Transactions: Mail Handling in the U.S. Senate," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 117-137, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:3:y:1992:i:1:p:117-137
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.3.1.117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.1.117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.3.1.117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary J. Culnan & Pamela K. Armstrong, 1999. "Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 104-115, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:3:y:1992:i:1:p:117-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.