IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i2p532-556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Institutions We Trust? Trust in Government and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Eesley

    (Stanford Technology Ventures Program, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 93405)

  • Yong Suk Lee

    (Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556)

Abstract

Whether entrepreneurship generates economic growth depends on the institutional environment due to its impact on the mix of productive and unproductive entrepreneurship in the economy. The incentive structure embedded in each society affects whether talented people become entrepreneurs and potentially, the extent to which they engage in more productive forms of entrepreneurship. We examine how trust in institutions affects the entrepreneurial intentions of potentially productive entrepreneurs. We utilize the unique event surrounding the impeachment of South Korea’s previous president. The event improved people’s trust in the government because it was ultimately the people’s protests and demands that led to the impeachment of the president for influence peddling and extracting personal rents from businesses. By surveying the same individuals before and after the impeachment ruling, we identify people’s changes in trust in government and various institutions. We find that increased trust in institutions increases one’s intent to start a business within five years. Moreover, we show that the relationship between trust in institutions and entrepreneurial intention is significantly stronger for engineering majors from top universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Eesley & Yong Suk Lee, 2023. "In Institutions We Trust? Trust in Government and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Intentions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 532-556, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:532-556
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1583
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:532-556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.