IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i3p1212-1231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Do Firms Trade Patents?

Author

Listed:
  • Jung H. Kwon

    (Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Haemin Dennis Park

    (Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Shu Deng

    (Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

Abstract

Drawing on the Coase theorem, we consider a firm’s decision to transfer patent ownership to another firm in the markets for innovation. We deem that the proximity of a patent’s technology structure to that of a firm’s patent portfolio will generally result in greater marginal productivity of the patent, leading to enhanced prospects for the firm’s economic return. We thus predict that firms are more likely to trade patents when the technology structure of a patent is closer to the technology stock of a potential buyer compared with that of its original assignee. However, such a relationship will be weaker when a potential buyer and the original assignee have greater product-market overlap or when the assignee has superior technological capability. We test these predictions by employing a dyad-level analysis of transactional decisions during the 1987–2016 period on 40,110 U.S. patents assigned to 57 major biopharmaceutical firms. Our study provides novel insights on factors that facilitate or inhibit patent trade in the markets for innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung H. Kwon & Haemin Dennis Park & Shu Deng, 2022. "When Do Firms Trade Patents?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1212-1231, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:1212-1231
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:1212-1231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.