IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i1p353-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Managers’ Affiliation Ties Have a Negative Relationship with Subordinates’ Interfirm Mobility? Evidence from Large U.S. Law Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Seth Carnahan

    (Strategy and Entrepreneurship, Olin Business School, Washington University, University City, Missouri 63130)

  • MaryJane Rabier

    (Accounting, Olin Business School, Washington University, University City, Missouri 63130)

  • Jose Uribe

    (Department of Management and Organizations, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

We hypothesize that employee mobility between organizations will be lower when the organizations’ managers share affiliation ties. We test this idea by examining interorganizational employee mobility between large corporate law practices. We find that a practice area is less likely to hire attorneys from a rival practice area when the leaders of the two practice areas attended the same law school at the same time, our proxy for the presence of an affiliation tie. The negative relationship is stronger for hiring higher-ranked attorneys, and it is driven by practice leaders from the same law school class. Exploiting appointments of new practice leaders, we find a sharp and immediate decline in interorganizational mobility following an appointment that creates an affiliation tie between the leadership of the practice areas. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that job seekers’ preferences drive the results, we conclude that rival managers’ ties deserve further scrutiny because they might limit the outside employment opportunities of their subordinates.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth Carnahan & MaryJane Rabier & Jose Uribe, 2022. "Do Managers’ Affiliation Ties Have a Negative Relationship with Subordinates’ Interfirm Mobility? Evidence from Large U.S. Law Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 353-372, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:353-372
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1447
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:353-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.