IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v32y2021i5p1149-1173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria (Shu) Zhang

    (Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

  • Marissa D. King

    (Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511)

Abstract

Although a substantial body of work has investigated drivers of tie formation, there is growing interest in understanding why relationships decay or dissolve altogether. The networks literature has tended to conceptualize tie decay as driven by processes similar to those underlying tie formation. Yet information that is revealed through ongoing interactions can exert different effects on tie formation and tie decay. This paper investigates how tie decay and tie formation processes differ by focusing on contentious practices. To the extent that information about dissimilarities in contentious practices is learned through ongoing interactions, it can exert diverging effects on tie formation and tie decay. Using a longitudinal data set of 141,543 physician dyads, we find that differences in contentious prescribing led ties to weaken or dissolve altogether but did not affect tie formation. The more contentious the practice and the more information available about the practice, the stronger the effect on tie decay and dissolution. Collectively, these findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of relationship evolution as an unfolding process through which deeper-level differences are revealed and shape the outcome of the tie.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria (Shu) Zhang & Marissa D. King, 2021. "Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 1149-1173, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:5:p:1149-1173
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2020.1412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2020.1412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:5:p:1149-1173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.