IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v32y2021i4p1033-1055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bad Company: Shifts in Social Activists’ Tactics and Resources After Industry Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Mary-Hunter McDonnell

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Kate Odziemkowska

    (Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005)

  • Elizabeth Pontikes

    (Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616)

Abstract

Social movement organizations (SMOs) are increasingly using collaborative tactics to engage firms. Implications of this are not well understood by researchers. This study investigates one risk that looms over such collaborations: if the corporate partner is later implicated in an industry scandal. Ideas are investigated in the context of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. First, we find that industry scandals differentially affect contentious and collaborative SMOs’ ability to mobilize resources. SMOs that had collaborated with the oil and gas industry before the spill suffered from reduced public support after the spill, and those that had contentiously interacted with the industry enjoyed increased contributions. Second, we find that industry scandals affect SMOs’ willingness to collaborate with firms in the future. We show that the Horizon oil spill produced a broad chilling effect on environmental SMOs’ collaborations with firms both within and outside of the oil and gas industry. Our findings show that there are risks inherent to a collaborative strategy that cannot be fully mitigated. Further, we demonstrate that industry scandals represent critical exogenous events that affect social activists’ tactical repertoires for engaging in private politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary-Hunter McDonnell & Kate Odziemkowska & Elizabeth Pontikes, 2021. "Bad Company: Shifts in Social Activists’ Tactics and Resources After Industry Crises," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1033-1055, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:1033-1055
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2020.1410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2020.1410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:1033-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.