IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i6p3581-3600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ALSO-X and ALSO-X+: Better Convex Approximations for Chance Constrained Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Jiang

    (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061)

  • Weijun Xie

    (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061)

Abstract

In a chance constrained program (CCP), decision makers seek the best decision whose probability of violating the uncertainty constraints is within the prespecified risk level. As a CCP is often nonconvex and is difficult to solve to optimality, much effort has been devoted to developing convex inner approximations for a CCP, among which the conditional value-at-risk ( CVaR ) has been known to be the best for more than a decade. This paper studies and generalizes the ALSO - X , originally proposed by A hmed, L uedtke, SO ng, and X ie in 2017 , for solving a CCP. We first show that the ALSO - X resembles a bilevel optimization, where the upper-level problem is to find the best objective function value and enforce the feasibility of a CCP for a given decision from the lower-level problem, and the lower-level problem is to minimize the expectation of constraint violations subject to the upper bound of the objective function value provided by the upper-level problem. This interpretation motivates us to prove that when uncertain constraints are convex in the decision variables, ALSO - X always outperforms the CVaR approximation. We further show (i) sufficient conditions under which ALSO - X can recover an optimal solution to a CCP; (ii) an equivalent bilinear programming formulation of a CCP, inspiring us to enhance ALSO - X with a convergent alternating minimization method ( ALSO - X + ); and (iii) an extension of ALSO - X and ALSO - X + to distributionally robust chance constrained programs (DRCCPs) under the ∞ − Wasserstein ambiguity set. Our numerical study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Jiang & Weijun Xie, 2022. "ALSO-X and ALSO-X+: Better Convex Approximations for Chance Constrained Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3581-3600, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:6:p:3581-3600
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2225
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:6:p:3581-3600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.