IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i6p3511-3518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shortfall Risk Models When Information on Loss Function Is Incomplete

Author

Listed:
  • Erick Delage

    (GERAD and Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 2A7, Canada)

  • Shaoyan Guo

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Huifu Xu

    (Department of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong)

Abstract

The utility-based shortfall risk (SR) measure effectively captures a decision maker’s risk attitude on tail losses by an increasing convex loss function. In this paper, we consider a situation where the decision maker’s risk attitude toward tail losses is ambiguous and introduce a robust version of SR, which mitigates the risk arising from such ambiguity. Specifically, we use some available partial information or subjective judgement to construct a set of utility-based loss functions and define a so-called preference robust shortfall risk (PRSR) through the worst loss function from the (ambiguity) set. We then apply the PRSR to optimal decision-making problems and demonstrate how the latter can be reformulated as tractable convex programs when the underlying exogenous uncertainty is discretely distributed.

Suggested Citation

  • Erick Delage & Shaoyan Guo & Huifu Xu, 2022. "Shortfall Risk Models When Information on Loss Function Is Incomplete," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3511-3518, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:6:p:3511-3518
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:6:p:3511-3518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.