IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i3p1806-1821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Always Valid Inference: Continuous Monitoring of A/B Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Ramesh Johari

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Pete Koomen

    (Optimizely, Inc., San Francisco, California 94105)

  • Leonid Pekelis

    (CloudTrucks, Inc., San Francisco, California 94103)

  • David Walsh

    (Unlearn.AI, San Francisco, California 94105)

Abstract

A/B tests are typically analyzed via frequentist p -values and confidence intervals, but these inferences are wholly unreliable if users endogenously choose samples sizes by continuously monitoring their tests. We define always valid p -values and confidence intervals that let users try to take advantage of data as fast as it becomes available, providing valid statistical inference whenever they make their decision. Always valid inference can be interpreted as a natural interface for a sequential hypothesis test, which empowers users to implement a modified test tailored to them. In particular, we show in an appropriate sense that the measures we develop trade off sample size and power efficiently, despite a lack of prior knowledge of the user’s relative preference between these two goals. We also use always valid p -values to obtain multiple hypothesis testing control in the sequential context. Our methodology has been implemented in a large-scale commercial A/B testing platform to analyze hundreds of thousands of experiments to date.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramesh Johari & Pete Koomen & Leonid Pekelis & David Walsh, 2022. "Always Valid Inference: Continuous Monitoring of A/B Tests," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1806-1821, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:1806-1821
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:1806-1821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.