IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v5y1957i6p765-774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Theory and Operations Research

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth J. Arrow

    (Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and Stanford University, Stanford, California)

Abstract

Decision theory, as it has grown up in recent years, is a formalization of the problems involved in making optimal choices. In a certain sense---a very abstract sense, to be sure---it incorporates operations research, theoretical economics, and wide areas of statistics, among others. The formal structure of a decision problem in any area can be put into four parts: (1) the choice of an objective function defining the relative desirability of different outcomes, (2) specification of the policy alternatives which are available to the agent, or decisionmaker, (3) specification of the model , that is, empirical relations that link the objective function, or the variables that enter into it, with the policy alternatives and possibly other variables, and (4) computational methods for choosing among the policy alternatives that one which performs best as measured by the objective function. In the last part, the objective function is maximized subject to the constraints imposed by the model. It is for this reason that decision theory is mathematically, to a great extent, a branch of the theory of constrained maxima.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth J. Arrow, 1957. "Decision Theory and Operations Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(6), pages 765-774, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:5:y:1957:i:6:p:765-774
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.5.6.765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.5.6.765
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.5.6.765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kovács, Máté, 2009. "Kinyilvánított preferencia és racionalitás [Declared preference and rationality]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 546-562.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:5:y:1957:i:6:p:765-774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.