IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v43y1995i2p243-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Person Zero-Sum Games for Network Interdiction

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Washburn

    (Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California)

  • Kevin Wood

    (Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California)

Abstract

A single evader attempts to traverse a path between two nodes in a network while a single interdictor attempts to detect the evader by setting up an inspection point along one of the network arcs. For each arc there is a known probability of detection if the evader traverses the arc that the interdictor is inspecting. The evader must determine a probabilistic “path-selection” strategy which minimizes the probability of detection while the interdictor must determine a probabilistic “arc-inspection” strategy which maximizes the probability of detection. The interdictor represents, in a simplified form, U.S. and allied forces attempting to interdict drugs and precursor chemicals as they are moved through river, road, and air routes in Latin America and the Caribbean. We show that the basic scenario is a two-person zero-sum game that might require the enumeration of an exponential number of paths, but then show that optimal strategies can be found using network flow techniques of polynomial complexity. To enhance realism, we also solve problems with unknown origins and destinations, multiple interdictors or evaders, and other generalizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Washburn & Kevin Wood, 1995. "Two-Person Zero-Sum Games for Network Interdiction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 243-251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:43:y:1995:i:2:p:243-251
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.43.2.243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.2.243
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.43.2.243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:43:y:1995:i:2:p:243-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.