IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v22y1974i1p177-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical Note—The Effectiveness of Ordinal Dominance in Decision Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Peter C. Fishburn

    (The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania)

  • Irving H. LaValle

    (Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana)

Abstract

The easily applied technique of ordinal-dominance analysis in decisions under uncertainty eliminates inferior pure strategies. It is most applicable when the decision-maker’s consequence utilities are known only up to a monotonic transformation (ordinally). Each strategy eliminated by ordinal dominance will also be eliminated by cardinal dominance for every utility function that preserves the decision-maker’s preference order on the consequences. This note shows that, in finite decisions under uncertainty, if a pure strategy is not ordinally dominated, then there is some utility function that preserves the decision-maker’s preference order on the consequences such that the pure strategy is not cardinally dominated under this utility function. Hence ordinal-dominance analysis eliminates every pure strategy that can be safely eliminated when only the decision-maker's preference weak-ordering of the consequences is known.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter C. Fishburn & Irving H. LaValle, 1974. "Technical Note—The Effectiveness of Ordinal Dominance in Decision Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 177-180, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:22:y:1974:i:1:p:177-180
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.22.1.177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.22.1.177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.22.1.177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:22:y:1974:i:1:p:177-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.