IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i2p701-721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product Development in Crowdfunding: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sıdıka Tunç Candoğan

    (NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245, Singapore)

  • Philipp B. Cornelius

    (Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands)

  • Bilal Gokpinar

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AA, United Kingdom)

  • Ersin Körpeoğlu

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AA, United Kingdom)

  • Christopher S. Tang

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095)

Abstract

Problem definition : Crowdfunding goes beyond raising funds. Entrepreneurs often use crowdfunding to solicit feedback from customers to improve their products and may therefore prefer to launch their crowdfunding campaigns using basic versions of their products with fewer features. However, customers may not be persuaded by a campaign if the product appears to be underdeveloped. In view of this tradeoff, a key question for entrepreneurs is how much to develop a product before launching a crowdfunding campaign. Methodology/results : Analyzing a game-theoretical model and testing its predictions empirically, we study (1) how the development level of a product at campaign launch, measured by the initial number of product features, influences whether customers will make comments that help entrepreneurs improve the product; (2) whether entrepreneurs continue to improve the product during the campaign; and (3) whether the campaign is successful. We show that, as the number of product features at campaign launch increases, the likelihood that customers will make comments and that the product will be improved during the campaign first increases but then decreases. Furthermore, the likelihood of campaign success first increases but then decreases with the number of product features at campaign launch. Finally, by analyzing the interactions between customer feedback, product improvement, and campaign success, we show that customer feedback motivates entrepreneurs to improve the product during the campaign. Moreover, entrepreneurs should take account of the initial number of features and customer feedback when improving the product, because otherwise product improvements can harm campaign success. Managerial implications : Our study provides practical insights on how entrepreneurs can use crowdfunding to aid product development and improvement. Specifically, entrepreneurs should avoid overdeveloping their products before crowdfunding campaigns because, as well as decreasing the chance of campaign success, this could hinder their ability to save development costs (e.g., market research costs) through involving customers in product development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sıdıka Tunç Candoğan & Philipp B. Cornelius & Bilal Gokpinar & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Christopher S. Tang, 2024. "Product Development in Crowdfunding: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 701-721, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:2:p:701-721
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0344
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:2:p:701-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.