IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i1p330-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Cover Images for Restaurant Reviews: AI vs. Wisdom of the Crowd

Author

Listed:
  • Warut Khern-am-nuai

    (Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 165, Canada)

  • Hyunji So

    (Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 165, Canada)

  • Maxime C. Cohen

    (Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 165, Canada)

  • Yossiri Adulyasak

    (Department of Logistics and Operations Management, HEC Montreal, Montréal, Québec H3T 2A7, Canada)

Abstract

Problem definition : Restaurant review platforms, such as Yelp and TripAdvisor, routinely receive large numbers of photos in their review submissions. These photos provide significant value for users who seek to compare restaurants. In this context, the choice of cover images (i.e., representative photos of the restaurants) can greatly influence the level of user engagement on the platform. Unfortunately, selecting these images can be time consuming and often requires human intervention. At the same time, it is challenging to develop a systematic approach to assess the effectiveness of the selected images. Methodology/results : In this paper, we collaborate with a large review platform in Asia to investigate this problem. We discuss two image selection approaches, namely crowd-based and artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems. The AI-based system we use learns complex latent image features, which are further enhanced by transfer learning to overcome the scarcity of labeled data. We collaborate with the platform to deploy our AI-based system through a randomized field experiment to carefully compare both systems. We find that the AI-based system outperforms the crowd-based counterpart and boosts user engagement by 12.43%–16.05% on average. We then conduct empirical analyses on observational data to identify the underlying mechanisms that drive the superior performance of the AI-based system. Managerial implications : Finally, we infer from our findings that the AI-based system outperforms the crowd-based system for restaurants with (i) a longer tenure on the platform, (ii) a limited number of user-generated photos, (iii) a lower star rating, and (iv) lower user engagement during the crowd-based system.

Suggested Citation

  • Warut Khern-am-nuai & Hyunji So & Maxime C. Cohen & Yossiri Adulyasak, 2024. "Selecting Cover Images for Restaurant Reviews: AI vs. Wisdom of the Crowd," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 330-349, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:1:p:330-349
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0531
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:1:p:330-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.