IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i1p167-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contextual Ranking and Selection Method for Personalized Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Jianzhong Du

    (School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Siyang Gao

    (Department of Systems Engineering and School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Chun-Hung Chen

    (Department of Systems Engineering and Operations Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030)

Abstract

Problem definition : Personalized medicine (PM) seeks the best treatment for each patient among a set of available treatment methods. Because a specific treatment does not work well on all patients, traditionally, the best treatment was selected based on the doctor’s personal experience and expertise, which is subject to human errors. In the meantime, stochastic models have been well developed in the literature for a lot of major diseases. This gives rise to a simulation-based solution for PM, which uses the simulation tool to evaluate the performance for pairs of treatment and patient biometric characteristics and, based on that, selects the best treatment for each patient characteristic. Methodology/results : In this research, we extend the ranking and selection (R&S) model in simulation-based decision making to solving PM. The biometric characteristics of a patient are treated as a context for R&S, and we call it contextual ranking and selection (CR&S). We consider two formulations of CR&S with small and large context spaces, respectively, and develop new techniques for solving them and identifying the rate-optimal budget allocation rules. Based on them, two selection algorithms are proposed, which can be shown to be numerically superior via a set of tests on abstract and real-world examples. Managerial implications : This research provides a systematic way of conducting simulation-based decision-making for PM. To improve the overall decision quality for the possible contexts, more simulation efforts should be devoted to contexts in which it is difficult to distinguish between the best treatment and non-best treatments, and our results quantify the optimal trade-off of the simulation efforts between the pairs of contexts and treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianzhong Du & Siyang Gao & Chun-Hung Chen, 2024. "A Contextual Ranking and Selection Method for Personalized Medicine," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 167-181, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:1:p:167-181
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:1:p:167-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.