IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i6p2122-2141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind the Gap: Gender Disparity in Online Learning Platform Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihan (Helen) Wang

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Jun Li

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Di (Andrew) Wu

    (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

Problem definition : Education technology innovations, such as massive open online course (MOOC) platforms, could potentially enable a more inclusive learning environment by delivering education to traditionally disadvantaged learners, like women. However, inclusivity does not necessarily translate into equal treatment on the platform. We investigate whether female and male learners benefit equally from forum discussions—typically the only form of interaction available—in online learning platforms. Methodology/results : Utilizing a large-scale, interaction-level data set on 174 courses on Coursera, we uncover an economically sizable and statistically significant disparity between male and female learners in receiving responses to their posts in MOOC discussion forums. On average, female learners’ questions are 3.11 percentage points less likely to receive responses from teaching staff than male learners’ questions, which equals 15.2% of the female group average. We also find significant gender disparity in staff response quality and sentiments. We investigate possible mechanisms behind the gender disparity using new techniques, including textual analysis tools. We show that the disparity is not because of content differences in male and female learners’ posts, nor is it attributable to their linguistic styles or the reputation of the posters. Instead, our results are most consistent with a male-driven gender homophily mechanism; although female staff members are gender neutral in their interactions with learners, male staff members systemically prefer responding to posts from male learners. We additionally show that receiving staff response leads to significant improvement in course passing rates, particularly for female learners. Therefore, the unequal access to information through course forums unfavorably hinders female learners’ performance. Managerial implications : Our results provide operational and organizational suggestions to platforms and content providers, including degendering user identifiers, implementing a content-focused post recommendation system, incorporating a gender-neutral user reputation system, promoting the recruiting of female teaching staff, and providing staff training that highlights the importance of gender-neutral interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihan (Helen) Wang & Jun Li & Di (Andrew) Wu, 2023. "Mind the Gap: Gender Disparity in Online Learning Platform Interactions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2122-2141, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:6:p:2122-2141
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0426
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:6:p:2122-2141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.