IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i5p1692-1710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taming the Long Tail: The Gambler’s Fallacy in Intermittent Demand Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Bi

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200437, China)

  • Long He

    (School of Business, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052)

  • Chung Piaw Teo

    (NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077)

Abstract

Problem definition: “Long tail” products with intermittent demand often tie up valuable warehouse space and capital investment for many companies. Furthermore, the paucity of demand data poses additional challenges for model estimation and performance evaluation. Traditional inventory solutions are not designed for products with intermittent demand. In this paper, we propose a new framework to optimize the choice of “replenishment timing” and “replenishment quantity” for managing the inventory metrics of long tail products, when evaluated over a finite horizon. Methodology/results: Our analysis is motivated by a recent interesting observation that the gambler’s fallacy phenomenon actually holds in a finite number of coin tosses. We use this phenomenon to analyze the inventory problem for intermittent demand to demonstrate that classical inventory models using KPIs such as fill rate, average cost per cycle, or average cost per unit, etc., must necessarily “bias” the underlying demand distribution to account for the finite horizon effect. We provide the exact closed-form expressions of the biased distribution to account for this effect in performance evaluation. The results show that the choice of replenishment timing and replenishment quantity is essential to superior performance on several key inventory metrics. Managerial implications: For long tail products, the belief that it is less likely for another demand to arrive shortly after a preceding one (the gambler’s fallacy), turns out to be true when performance is tabulated over a finite horizon, even if demands across time are independent. So it pays to delay the replenishment of depleted stocks to save on holding cost and warehouse space. Managers can optimize the replenishment timing, besides choosing the replenishment quantity, to optimize the performance metrics of several classes of inventory problems. This is especially useful for companies managing a large number of long tail products.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Bi & Long He & Chung Piaw Teo, 2023. "Taming the Long Tail: The Gambler’s Fallacy in Intermittent Demand Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1692-1710, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:5:p:1692-1710
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.1217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.1217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:5:p:1692-1710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.