IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i3p812-826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational Transparency: Showing When Work Gets Done

Author

Listed:
  • Robert L. Bray

    (Operations Management Department, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

Abstract

Problem definition : Do the benefits of operational transparency depend on when the work is done? Academic/practical relevance : This work connects the operations management literature on operational transparency with the psychology literature on the peak-end effect. Methodology : This study examines how customers respond to operational transparency with parcel delivery data from the Cainiao Network, the logistics arm of Alibaba. The sample comprises 4.68 million deliveries. Each delivery has between 4 and 10 track-package activities, which customers can check in real time, and a delivery service score, which customers leave after receiving the package. Instrumental-variable regressions quantify the causal effect of track-package-activity times on delivery scores. Results : The regressions suggest that customers punish early idleness less than late idleness, leaving higher delivery service scores when track-package activities cluster toward the end of the shipping horizon. For example, if a shipment takes 100 hours, then delaying the time of the average action from hour 20 to hour 80 increases the expected delivery score by approximately the same amount as expediting the arrival time from hour 100 to hour 73. Managerial implications : Memory limitations make customers especially sensitive to how service operations end.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert L. Bray, 2023. "Operational Transparency: Showing When Work Gets Done," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 812-826, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:812-826
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:3:p:812-826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.