IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i2p775-791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Off-Platform Threats in On-Demand Services

Author

Listed:
  • Eryn Juan He

    (David Eccles School of Business, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112)

  • Sergei Savin

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Joel Goh

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, Singapore 119245; Global Asia Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076; Institute of Operations Research and Analytics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

  • Chung-Piaw Teo

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, NUS Business School, Singapore 119245; Institute of Operations Research and Analytics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

Abstract

Problem definition : Online platforms that provide on-demand services are often threatened by the phenomenon of leakage , where customer-provider pairs may decide to transact “off-platform” to avoid paying commissions to the platform. This paper investigates properties of services that make them vulnerable or resistant to leakage. Academic/practical relevance: In practice, much attention has been given to platform leakage, with platforms experimenting with multiple approaches to alleviate leakage and maintain their customer and provider bases. Yet, there is a current dearth of studies in the operations literature that systematically analyze the key factors behind platform leakage. Our work fills this gap and answers practical questions regarding the sustainability of platform. Methodology : We develop two game-theoretical models that capture service providers’ and customers’ decisions whether to conduct transactions on or off the platform. In the first (“perfect information”) model, we assume that customers are equipped with information to select their desired providers on the platform, whereas in the second (“imperfect information”) model, we assume customers are randomly matched with available providers by the platform. Results : For profit maximizing platforms, we show that leakage occurs if and only if the value of the counterparty risk from off-platform transactions exceeds a threshold. Across both models, platforms tend to be more immunized against leakage as provider pool sizes increase, customer valuations for service increase, their waiting costs decrease, or variability in service times are reduced. Finally, by comparing the degree of leakage between both settings, we find that neither model dominates the other across all parameter combinations. Managerial implications : Our results provide guidance to existing platform managers or entrepreneurs who are considering “platforming” their services. Namely, based on a few key features of the operating environment, managers can assess the severity of the threat of platform leakage for their specific business context. Our results also suggest how redesigning the waiting process, reducing service time variability, upskilling providers can reduce the threat of leakage. They also suggest the conditions under which revealing provider quality information to customers can help to curb leakage.

Suggested Citation

  • Eryn Juan He & Sergei Savin & Joel Goh & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2023. "Off-Platform Threats in On-Demand Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 775-791, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:775-791
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:775-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.