IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i1p108-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Biomanufacturing Yield with Bleed–Feed: Optimal Policies and Insights

Author

Listed:
  • Yesim Koca

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5612 AZ, Netherlands)

  • Tugce Martagan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5612 AZ, Netherlands)

  • Ivo Adan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5612 AZ, Netherlands)

  • Lisa Maillart

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261)

  • Bram van Ravenstein

    (MSD Animal Health, Boxmeer 5831 AN, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem definition : Bleed–feed is a novel technology that allows biomanufacturers to skip intermediary bioreactor setups. However, the specific time at which bleed–feed is performed is critical for success. The process is stringently regulated, and its implementation involves unique tradeoffs in operational decision making. Our analysis formalizes the operational challenges related to bleed–feed decisions, and our results inform biomanufacturers and policymakers on the potential impact of this technology on current practice. Academic/practical relevance : Operations management (OM) methodologies have not yet been widely adopted in the biomanufacturing industry. This research presents one of the first attempts to demonstrate how OM can complement biomanufacturing to improve operational decisions. We present a practically relevant problem and a rigorous solution approach that is relevant to both OM and biomanufacturing. Methodology : We develop a finite-horizon, discrete-time Markov decision processes model and analyze the structural characteristics of optimal bleed–feed policies. Moreover, we characterize the behavior of the value function as a function of regulatory restrictions. As a salient feature, the MDP model captures both the biological dynamics of fermentation and the operational tradeoffs in biomanufacturing. Results : We show that optimal bleed–feed policies have a three-way control-limit structure under mild conditions that were validated with industry data. Moreover, our analysis reveals that the marginal benefits of bleed–feed diminish as additional bleed–feeds are performed. As a practically relevant benchmark, we consider a risk-averse heuristic and identify sufficient conditions for its optimality. Managerial implications : Our analysis (supported with an industry case study) shows that bleed–feed implementation can provide benefits. Real-world implementation at MSD resulted in an 82.5% improvement in the batch yield per setup (using one bleed–feed). We find that low-risk fermentation systems benefit the most from bleed–feed implementation. We also find that the performance gap between optimal policies and the risk-averse heuristic is higher when the failure risks or the critical biomass levels are lower.

Suggested Citation

  • Yesim Koca & Tugce Martagan & Ivo Adan & Lisa Maillart & Bram van Ravenstein, 2023. "Increasing Biomanufacturing Yield with Bleed–Feed: Optimal Policies and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 108-125, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:108-125
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:108-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.