IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i6p2825-2842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overbooked and Overlooked: Machine Learning and Racial Bias in Medical Appointment Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Samorani

    (Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

  • Shannon L. Harris

    (School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284)

  • Linda Goler Blount

    (Black Women’s Health Imperative, Washington, District of Columbia 20003)

  • Haibing Lu

    (Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

  • Michael A. Santoro

    (Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

Abstract

Problem definition: Machine learning is often employed in appointment scheduling to identify the patients with the greatest no-show risk, so as to schedule them into or right after overbooked slots. That scheduling decision maximizes the clinic performance, as measured by a weighted sum of all patients’ waiting time and the provider’s overtime and idle time. However, if a racial group is characterized by a higher no-show risk, then the patients belonging to that racial group will be scheduled into or right after overbooked slots disproportionately to the general population. Academic/Practical Relevance: That scheduling decision is problematic because patients scheduled in those slots tend to have a worse service experience than the other patients, as measured by the time they spend in the waiting room. Thus, the challenge becomes minimizing the schedule cost while avoiding racial disparities. Methodology : Motivated by the real-world case of a large specialty clinic whose black patients have a higher no-show probability than non-black patients, we analytically study racial disparity in this context. Then, we propose new objective functions that minimize both schedule cost and racial disparity and that can be readily adopted by researchers and practitioners. We develop a race-aware objective, which instead of minimizing the waiting times of all patients, minimizes the waiting times of the racial group expected to wait the longest. We also develop race-unaware methodologies that do not consider race explicitly. We validate our findings both on simulated and real-world data. Results : We demonstrate that state-of-the-art scheduling systems cause the black patients in our data set to wait about 30% longer than nonblack patients. Our race-aware methodology achieves both goals of eliminating racial disparity and obtaining a similar schedule cost as that obtained by the state-of-the-art scheduling method, whereas the race-unaware methodologies fail to obtain both efficiency and fairness. Managerial implications : Our work uncovers that the traditional objective of minimizing schedule cost may lead to unintended racial disparities. Both efficiency and fairness can be achieved by adopting a race-aware objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Samorani & Shannon L. Harris & Linda Goler Blount & Haibing Lu & Michael A. Santoro, 2022. "Overbooked and Overlooked: Machine Learning and Racial Bias in Medical Appointment Scheduling," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 2825-2842, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:2825-2842
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0999
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:2825-2842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.