IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i6p1562-1579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Setting Retail Staffing Levels: A Methodology Validated with Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Marshall Fisher

    (The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Santiago Gallino

    (The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Serguei Netessine

    (The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

Abstract

Problem definition : How should retail staffing levels be set? While cost of labor is well understood, the revenue implications of having the right staffing level are hard to estimate. Moreover, these implications vary by store; hence, staffing levels should vary as well. Academic/practical relevance : We provide a novel method for setting store associate staffing at the individual store level. We discuss a field implementation that tested this methodology. Methodology : We use historical data on revenue and planned and actual staffing levels by store to estimate how revenue varies with the staffing level at each store. We disentangle the endogeneity between revenue and staffing levels by focusing on randomly occurring deviations between planned and actual labor. Using historical analysis as a guide, we validate these results by changing the staffing levels in a few test stores. We implement the results chain-wide and measure the impact in a large specialty retailer. Results : We find that the implementation validates predictions of the historical analysis. The implementation in 168 stores over six months produces a 4.5% revenue increase and a nearly $7.4 million annual profit increase. The impact of staffing level on revenue varies greatly by store. Managerial implications : Our paper makes three contributions to academic literature and to retail practice. First, we describe a process by which retailers can improve the most common industry practice: set store labor to be proportional to forecasted store revenue. Our proposed approach systematically sets the labor level in each store. Second, we demonstrate the effectiveness of that process via a field test and then via chain-wide implementation over a six-month time period. Finally, most retailers set store labor at the same level across stores, proportionate to revenue. We show that this is not the best approach because the revenue impact of store labor varies by store. The stores in our study that could benefit from relatively more labor were those with high potential demand, closely located competition for that demand, and experienced store managers. Overall, we provide the first simple but rigorous, field-tested approach that any retailer can use to increase revenue and profitability through better labor management.

Suggested Citation

  • Marshall Fisher & Santiago Gallino & Serguei Netessine, 2021. "Setting Retail Staffing Levels: A Methodology Validated with Implementation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1562-1579, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1562-1579
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0917
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1562-1579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.