IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i6p1543-1561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Chengfan Hou

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Mengshi Lu

    (Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Tianhu Deng

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Zuo-Jun Max Shen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720)

Abstract

Problem definition : Project outsourcing has been a pronounced trend in many industries but is also recognized as a major cause for project delays. We study how companies can coordinate outsourced projects with uncertain completion times through bilateral contract negotiations. Academic/practical relevance : Misaligned subcontractor incentives may result in substantial losses to both project clients and subcontractors. Coordinating subcontractors’ efforts through proper contracts is imperative to the success of project outsourcing. Most previous studies on project contracting have not addressed subcontractors’ bargaining powers or the dynamic bargaining process in negotiations. We fill in this gap by studying bilateral bargaining between the client and subcontractors, which better reflects real-world negotiations. Methodology : We model project contract negotiations as a multiunit bilateral bargaining game. We derive the conditions such that bilateral negotiations can achieve system coordination and characterize the equilibrium negotiation outcomes. We then compare the conditions and equilibria under various model settings to study their impact on project contracting. Results : Our study uncovers how the coordination of project outsourcing is impacted by the contract form, bargaining power structure, precedence network topology, payment timing, external opportunities, and negotiation protocols. For single-task projects, the widely used fixed-price (cost-plus) contract can achieve system coordination only when the subcontractor (client) possesses full bargaining power. Cost-sharing and time-based incentive contracts, which perform well for single-task projects, may not be effective for projects with parallel tasks when any subcontractor’s bargaining power is sufficiently high. Projects with serial tasks can be coordinated only under certain extreme bargaining power structures. Delaying payments always exacerbates the incentive misalignment. Managerial implications : Our analysis provides insights and guidelines to companies regarding how to select proper contract forms and payment timing schemes, based on the characteristics of the projects and subcontractors, to ensure the effectiveness of project outsourcing. Our results also highlight the importance of bargaining modeling in project contracting.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengfan Hou & Mengshi Lu & Tianhu Deng & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2021. "Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1543-1561, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1543-1561
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0911
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1543-1561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.